Am I the only one who finds it hilarious that Australia’s closet homosexual Prime Minister made a fat chick cry on the weekend?

The eSafety Commissioner will be stalking me for that one. If the frightbats are to be believed, you are statistically more likely to stab five women to death in a shopping centre just for reading that opening hook.

After the mass murder at Bondi Junction and the stabbing of Bishop Mari, Australia’s political and media elites hyperventilated for a fortnight about “social cohesion”, ie Anglos were not allowed to talk about a terror attack committed by a foreigner lest it reflect badly on all foreigners and undermine the mass replacement immigration regime. In doing so they were effectively victim blaming.

Since the weekend, Australia’s political and media elites have hyperventilated that violence against women means that all men are evil.

It’s so stupid. We covered all of this six years ago when Andy Nolch created the single greatest work of political art in Australia’s history.

It takes balls to draw a dick on the memorial to a murdered feminist

Hilariously, the weekend’s rally in Canberra was titled the “what was she wearing rally”, (ie against victim blaming.) If t[hey’re prepared to go on a watchlist, male recipients of female violence could consider holding a “what did he say to her” rally.

The loonies have however inadvertently stumbled upon a good idea.

Basically, they want to prevent children from accessing porn. Though the only feasible way of doing this currently is through a massive invasion of privacy, dressed up as protecting privacy:

eSafety recently put together a roadmap looking at other options to establish an age verification scheme in Australia.

It looked at newer technologies designed to get around requirements for porn users to have to provide personal documents.

It considered facial analysis tools, which look at an image or video of a user and estimate their age, to be promising both on their accuracy and their ability to protect a user’s privacy.

It also looked at third-party “tokens”, where a provider checks a person’s age, and issues a token which can be used to access porn websites.

That way the company issuing the token doesn’t know what it is being used for, and the porn website only has to verify the user’s token without recording the visit.

It ties in nicely with the WEF Digital ID agenda, and it won’t work. Furthermore they don’t really care that porn is harmful to both children and adults alike, they have simply convinced themselves that boys who like looking at boobs are all going to stab women in the supermarket when they grow up.

So, why am I saying this is a good idea? Because it’s on the right track. Porn is basically heroin.

There is a very simple way to restrict children’s access to porn.

Ban porn.

Of course it would still be made, watched, etc. Many adults and children would still access it because humanity is sinful. Organised crime would get involved and things would get really ugly. Yeah, and there will be long boring arguments over what constitutes art and what constitutes pornography and everybody will get so bored of hearing about it that their dicks will just drop off because they’re so bored.

All of that would be preferable to what we have now.

We used to have obscenity laws in the West for good reason, which were deliberately undermined by the usual suspects for the usual reasons. As stated it did not prevent the creation, distribution or viewing of porn, however it prevented its normalisation.

Our entire civilisation is now crushed under a gigantic shit tsunami of porn. Porn is everywhere and in everything. It is the dirty open secret of the modern West. The vast majority of males are watching it and the vast majority of females are either making porn or pre-porn. It is a sin, a mass humiliation ritual, and it has sucked the creativity and drive out of several generations.

If the “family and sexual violence commissioner” is serious about restricting boys’ use of porn, she would demand federal funding for nofap initiatives. Predictably though, the Dying Press attempts to demonise men who help other men to stop using porn.

Similarly, political and media elites have done everything they can to demonise White men who network to improve their lives, build healthy families and found new communities detached from the poison of modernity:

In its submission to the inquiry, the CEP also flagged the use of “Active Clubs” as a recruitment tool for right-wing extremists.

Already a key recruiting tactic overseas, the project said Active Clubs had become increasingly prominent in Australia, with Mr Sewell taking to X (formerly known as Twitter) earlier this week to promote their work.

“A key component is to hide in plain sight,” the submission said.

Active Clubs are groups of men who participate in combat sports training and political street activism — a combination the CEP said was a mask for something darker.

“The strategy instructs members to look and behave like ‘regular guys’,” the submission said.

Again, this is all so stupid. Getting together to lift weights and punch each other in the head is one of the best things we can do as White men. While you’re there you can talk about history, politics and life, you can pray, eat loads of meat off the BBQ and build your confidence.

The meme is real. It changes you physically, mentally and spiritually, and with the aid of Jesus Christ it is the best way to defeat porn addiction.

This article was first published at XYZ

SUGGESTED ARTICLES