The following article is authored by the fantastic Paul Joseph Watson. It details a report uploaded to the net and then hastily deleted. Of course, the internet never forgets and the report was downloaded and re uploaded where it remains today.

The document is all about using group psychology to control large groups, or even entire nations.

Scary as that may be, what many don’t realise is that the person in charge of these shadowy semi-government organisations that authored the report, is a woman called Susan Mitchie who is a member of the Communist Party of Britain.

Check out her bio here: and Here is one of her papers from the prestigious University College London.

The Communist Party of Britain is committed to Marxist/Leninist theory (the same theory that left around 100 million dead bodies littering the last century).

I personally, can find little justification for the premise that Communism is morally superior to National Socialism.

In terms of body count, Communism comes out way in front. Can you imagine a member of the British National Socialist party heading up Government advisory committees?

Can you imagine the outrage? Yet here we have a committed Marxist/Leninist doing just that.

Advising a supposedly Conservative Government led by Boris the Globalist Clown on how to lockdown the nation and cower people into submission.

What did we sing when we were kids?

Rule Britannia, Britannia rule the waves,

England never never never shall be slaves.

Please God help save us from these lunatics

The article can be read here at summit news:

Climate change technocrats plan on using same methods that convinced public to obey lockdown.

Harry Richardson


Deleted Government Report Celebrates How Public Loves to “Conform”

Climate change technocrats plan on using same methods that convinced public to obey lockdown.

Published 2 days ago on 22 October, 2021
Paul Joseph Watson

A deleted government report exploring how to make the public alter its behaviour to accept the new ‘green economy’ reveals how COVID-19 restrictions have created a population with a “deep set reverence” for authority and a “powerful tendency to conform.”

The report was inadvertently published by the British government before being hastily pulled down, but numerous journalists were able to retrieve its contents.

The document explored how to weaponize behavioural psychology to ‘nudge’ the public into supporting measures and adopting behaviour without them explicitly knowing they’re being manipulated.

The investigation found that the same techniques the government used to force people into accepting lockdown could be used to make them change their lifestyles in the name of preventing climate change.

Under the heading “principles for successful behaviour,” the paper noted;

“Government statements, actions and laws powerfully shape perceptions of normative and acceptable behaviour. For instance, even with public criticism being high, many still perceived government approval as the yardstick for safe behaviour during COVID-19 ‘we’re allowed to do this now [so must be safe]…’. This reveals, for many, a deep set reverence for legitimate government authority, regardless of one’s personal political views.”

While PR stunts such as having officials vaccinated live on television worked to convince people of the narrative, elite hypocrisy (public officials violating lockdown rules) was found to cause significant damage to public trust.

“Perceived hypocrisy can do a lot to undermine efforts to build public engagement and support. This was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic when prominent authority figures broke guidelines, leading to measurable reductions in public compliance as well as shifting attitudes.”

“Green politics has similar deep-seated reputational issues with elite hypocrisy,” notes Breitbart. “A common feature of climate change summits has been high-profile attendees arriving by private or government jet, a disconnect between word and deed that seems unlikely to vanish in the near term.”

The paper concluded that people can be rather easily “nudged” into changing their behavior in response to government announcements and “have a powerful tendency to conform.”

The investigation also found that even if enforced changes to lifestyle are not wanted by the public, most tend to fall in line with the new status quo rather quickly anyway.

The report was prepared by the Behavioural Insights Team (BIT), a quasi-government body that was part of the effort to use “totalitarian” and “unethical” methods of instilling fear into the population as a means of scaring them into complying with lockdown rules.

A related group, the Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours team, warned at the start of the first lockdown that a “substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened [by Covid-19].”

“The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging,” the group added, leading to numerous lurid propaganda campaigns that exaggerated the threat of COVID to bully the public into total submission.

In summary, the public is largely unthinking, compliant and docile and can be made to go along with just about anything so long as they’re bombarded with the right propaganda.